Makernice
← All posts
A wooden filing cabinet with one drawer pulled open, rows of unlabeled film canisters stacked inside under soft window lightComparisons

What Are the Best VideoAll.AI Alternatives for Seedance in 2026?

Makernice Team · ·

Key takeaways

  • VideoAll.AI is a workspace for choosing, generating and managing AI video and image outputs, sold on annual, monthly and one-time credit plans, with no public API that we could find.
  • Its pricing page says credit cost depends on model, duration, quality, output count and resolution, and the numbers appear only in the app before you generate.
  • China Video AI publishes per-plan credit costs for Seedance 2.5, Seedance 2.0 and MiniMax H3; Kolbo.AI and TapNow offer workspace or canvas tools; gVideo runs one subscription credit pool.
  • Makernice is the option for calling those models from code: a public price list, a price on every run, and a US-dollar balance with no subscription.
  • Keep VideoAll.AI if a single browser workspace for managing outputs matters more to you than seeing each model's cost up front.
Ask an AI assistant about this pageAsk ChatGPTAsk ClaudeAsk Perplexity

If you want to leave VideoAll.AI, China Video AI, Kolbo.AI, Makernice, TapNow and gVideo cover the Seedance and MiniMax models it shows on its model pages. Four of them are browser studios like VideoAll.AI, and Makernice is an API with a console form. The biggest practical difference is visibility: most of these publish what a model costs before you sign up. We checked each site on November 11, 2026.

Why is VideoAll.AI hard to budget?

VideoAll.AI describes itself as "One workspace for choosing, generating, and managing AI video and image outputs." Its pricing page explains that "Credit cost depends on model, duration, quality, output count, and resolution." and that the app previews cost before generation, but the Seedance 2.5, Seedance 2.0 and MiniMax H3 model pages carry no credit figures. On the plan side, the annual Pro tier lists 36,000 credits a year while monthly Pro lists 3,600 a month, so the yearly plan delivers fewer credits than twelve monthly payments.

Its rules are mixed. "If a generation task fails due to system error, credits used for that task will be automatically refunded.", yet "Payments are generally non-refundable except where required by applicable law." It doesn't say whether credits expire. One-time packs are sold beside the plans, payment icons include cards, PayPal, SEPA and Cash App, and free access may carry watermarks or limits.

VideoAll.AI alternatives and how they charge

China Video AI, Kolbo.AI, TapNow and gVideo are browser studios like VideoAll.AI, and Makernice is an API with a console form. China Video AI and TapNow publish credit tables, and Makernice publishes a full price list.

PlatformBest forHow it billsSource checked
China Video AISeedance and MiniMax H3 work with published credit costs per planMonthly or annual credit plans, plus one-time credit packschinavideoai.com · 2026-11-11
Kolbo.AIA workspace that mixes video, image and music generationCredit subscriptions or one-time packs, quoted per clip or imagekolbo.ai · 2026-11-11
MakerniceCalling Seedance and MiniMax from code with a price per runPrepaid US-dollar balance, per output second or per image; no expiryMakernice pricing · live price list
TapNowVisual creators who plan shots on an agentic canvasTapies credits per second of video, sold in US dollarstapnow.ai · 2026-11-11
gVideoOne monthly credit pool across a short model listPaid subscriptions only; credits reset each billing dategvideo.ai · 2026-11-11

With no public per-model numbers from VideoAll.AI, there's nothing to set beside Makernice's rates; the VideoAll.AI alternative page explains what we could and couldn't confirm.

Which VideoAll.AI alternative replaces it for your kind of work?

VideoAll.AI's closest model match is China Video AI. Kolbo.AI fits a mixed video, image and music workspace, Makernice fits scripts that pick the model, TapNow fits canvas work, and gVideo fits one subscription with exact credits shown before each render.

China Video AI is the closest on models, with Seedance 2.5, Seedance 2.0, Seedance 2.0 Fast, MiniMax H3 and Seedream 5.0, and it lists how many credits each model takes on every plan. Plans set concurrency, from 1 job on Basic up to 8 on the top tier, and promise "Watermark-free exports ready to deliver" with "Commercial rights included". Packs are sold one time, and refunds on unused pack credits must be reported within 7 days. Its failed-job wording is loose: failed jobs "may be refunded according to the product logic configured for the service."

Kolbo.AI is the workspace pick, covering video, image and music in one place. It shows an estimated cost in Kolbo credits and tells you to confirm the final quote before each generation. A free tier gives 80 credits a month; paid subscription credits roll over while paid access remains active, and one-time packs need no plan. A separate developer API wallet in US dollars exists, though we found no docs address. Refunds require that no credits were used in the period and a request within 7 days.

Makernice suits the case where a script, not a person, picks the model. It serves 19 video and image models, including Seedance 2.5, Seedance 2.0 and MiniMax H3, through a REST API, an MCP server, and a create form in the console that runs the same models at the same price. Prices are public, and each run is priced in advance: REST quotes are held for 12 minutes, while over MCP generate stops any job priced above your max_cost_usd. You top up US dollars once and the balance never expires. Failed, timed-out and input-rejected runs aren't charged; an output blocked by output moderation still is. There is no workspace for organizing outputs, and each file expires, so store what you keep.

TapNow calls itself an agentic creative canvas and prices video in Tapies per second, with US-dollar charges. Its monthly generations table lists only a few video models and resolutions, Seedance 2.5 and Seedance 2.0 among them. Subscription Tapies come in batches valid for 60 days, top-ups last 3 years, and a new-user grant lasts 30 days. Subscriptions are generally non-refundable, and we found no statement on failed generations or a public API.

gVideo sells "One subscription, one credit pool", and "Exact credits per render are always shown in the studio before you generate." Generating requires a paid plan; subscription credits reset on your billing date without rolling over, and we found no one-time packs. "Credits are automatically refunded if a generation fails." Commercial use is allowed on all paid plans. Among the models we matched it carries Seedance 2.0 and Happy Horse 1.1.

Credits, files and access compared with VideoAll.AI

VideoAll.AI shows costs only inside its app, doesn't state a credit expiry and shows no public API. Each alternative answers those three gaps differently, as the list below sets out.

  • Cost before signing up: VideoAll.AI shows numbers only in its app. China Video AI and TapNow publish credit tables, and Makernice publishes a full price list on pricing.
  • Expiry: VideoAll.AI doesn't say. TapNow subscription batches last 60 days and gVideo credits reset monthly; Kolbo.AI rolls credits over while subscribed, and a Makernice balance doesn't expire.
  • Managing files: VideoAll.AI and Kolbo.AI are built around a workspace, and China Video AI lists a cloud asset library. Makernice outputs carry an expiresAt (30 days after completion in the docs example), so move them to your own storage.
  • From code: VideoAll.AI, TapNow and gVideo show no public API. Makernice connects to Claude Code and Cursor, with failed runs covered on failed generations.

When is VideoAll.AI worth keeping?

VideoAll.AI is worth keeping if you want one place in the browser to choose models, generate and manage the results, which an API like Makernice doesn't try to be. It also sells one-time credits without a subscription and accepts several payment methods, PayPal and SEPA among them. If you stay, work out the credits each plan actually delivers before taking the annual discount at face value; the VideoAll.AI alternative page walks through that.

Frequently asked questions

Where does VideoAll.AI show model costs?
Only in its generator. The pricing page says "Credit cost depends on model, duration, quality, output count, and resolution." and its model pages carry no credit figures.
Does VideoAll.AI refund failed generations?
Yes for system errors: "If a generation task fails due to system error, credits used for that task will be automatically refunded." Other payments are generally non-refundable.
Which VideoAll.AI alternative carries the same Seedance and MiniMax models?
China Video AI and Makernice both list Seedance 2.5, Seedance 2.0 and MiniMax H3. TapNow lists the two Seedance models.
Is the VideoAll.AI annual plan worth twelve months of the monthly plan?
Not in credits: annual Pro lists 36,000 credits a year, while monthly Pro lists 3,600 a month, which adds up to 43,200 over twelve months.